February 24, 2009An ode to the Kindle
This is what went through my head when the Kindle 1 was announced, over a year ago. The idea sounded vaguely intriguing, but also clearly sacrilegious for someone like me who's been fascinated by books since I was a little kid. I took a look at the early Kindle reviews and at the device itself and I dismissed it. It was not for me, and while the technology was promising, I was sure that it would take at least another five years before anything technologically credible came on the radar. I wasn't ready to let go of my paper books yet. The announcement of the Kindle 2 a few weeks ago made me go through the same questions again, and this time, the answers surprised me. Without even realizing it, I was strangely more open to the idea of reading on a clunky-looking black and white device. This was really puzzling since while all the early reviews praise the Kindle 2, everybody agrees that it is a minor upgrade over the first version. More like a Kindle 1.1. But despite this fact, not only did everybody already seem to like the new device, they also raved about how they liked their Kindle 1. A lot of Kindle 1 users even said they had already pre-ordered the new version, despite the steep price ($359, same as the Kindle 1 when it came out) and the fact that it was just a minor upgrade. While the sales of the Kindle 1 are believed to be decent but modest (betweeen 400k and 600k according to unofficial sources), the device has certainly created a niche of fans who just couldn't consider their reading world without the Kindle incorporated in it. Interestingly, all of them say that they are still reading paper books, so it's more about enhancing their experience than completely revolutionizing it. You read as many books on the Kindle as you can, but you use paper books for the rest. Thus began my slow mental conversion to a world of electronic words. Over the past few weeks, I started to think about what it would be like to have a Kindle, and as the days went by, I realized how many strong points the Kindle offers. So many more than I initially thought. So two weeks ago, I ordered one. Amazon informed me that it shipped today and I just can't wait to receive it. Here are some of the strongs points I found about the Kindle these past weeks, in no particular order.
Comments
I'm looking forward to your review. :) I'm on the fence myself but I'm kinda leaning that way. The folding thing is a great point. I've recently "discovered" graphic novels so the no color thing is kinda disappointing but at least those will fold open most of the time. :) Posted by: Justin Lee at February 24, 2009 08:55 AMI think you've overlooked something that I've just rediscovered: the library. What I really like about the library is that it makes it trivially easy to "test drive" authors for free. For example, I recently discovered David Gemmell, who writes these ancient Greece historical novels which are amazing. For me, the library is only for recreational reading (as opposed to technical programmer reading). Which turns out to be good because there are only a very small percentage of recreational reading books that I want to re-read later on (e.g., Farley Mowat's Grey Seas Under is great during wintery stormy weather). Also have a look at ncdl.lib.overdrive.com/AE6B1F16-8B22-4981-9881-A148C63AA5B1/10/246/en/Default.htm (Why the wierd url?) Ceric, After reading your post I got the impression that you were not aware of other e-book readers available on the market. Take Sony PRS-505, for example ( www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&productId=8198552921665245740 ) I bought a bunch of those for my friends in Russia, and it's considered one of the best (if not THE best) readers there - truly indispensable on those long subway rides. I haven't actually held a Kindle, but the Sony reader is light-weight, small, slick, and the screen quality is amazing. please don't consider this to be an advertisement for Sony - just a personal opinion. Posted by: Dmitriy Volk at February 24, 2009 01:46 PMHi Dmitriy, I'm well aware of the Sony e-reader and I looked at it as well. The problem I have with it is that I have to hook it up to my PC to get new books, and considering that I buy 99% of my books from Amazon, the Kindle has a big leg up over it. What finally convinced me that my office mate has a Sony reader and he ordered a Kindle 2 :-) Ah, that's interesting. Unfortunately, Amazon doesn't sell a lot of Russian books, so for me and my friends it's important to be able to load books from any source, plus, of course, the ability to update the firmware to display Cyrillic properly. Sorry I unintentionally misspelled your name, BTW I'm the office mate and I indeed just ordered a Kindle 2 to replace my Sony Reader. I was quite happy with the Sony product, especially in terms of size and design, but their books store is really not that great (unless, apparently, you are into romance novels), requires Windows (Mac/Linux alternatives suck), the PDF support is a joke and it's slow. That said, it's a great device that I really enjoyed so far. Posted by: Romain Guy at February 24, 2009 08:07 PMLooking forward to hearing you review of the Kindle. In the meantime, I figured you would like to see what the insides of your new toy look like. www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/02/25/kindle-2-teardown-reveals-some-surprising-surprises/ Posted by: Rob Kedoin at February 25, 2009 08:48 AMI have the Sony reader. I bought it mostly to read PDF files and it does not do a good job of it. The Kindle is interesting to me. Does it work well with PDF? As Romain mentioned, the Sony reader does not work well with PDF. Posted by: Rick Hightower at February 26, 2009 09:24 AMI have strong feelings about the experience of having to scroll horizontally in order to read a blog post. Posted by: Erik at February 26, 2009 03:11 PMWell, welcome to the club. However, I suggest a better device than the Kindle, that you already have: I have been reading lots of books on my ... PSA/smartphone for years (I started with my psion 5 many years ago). It has the same advantages of the kindle but it is free (you already have it), it has backlight (you can read at night), and you always have it with you! (I can read in the supermarket cas-hier queue). Note that smartphones with a scroll wheel (like the p1i) offer a much greater user experience. The size is smaller, of course, (but it much lighter) so the experience is more like reading a newspaper column than a page book. But I read "Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell" on it, which is no small feat considering the size of the book and the huge footnotes... Sorry, but reading on a PDA/Smartphone is worse in many ways. The battery will run out very quickly, you can't read it well in the sun, the screen is even smaller than the Kindle's (which I think is already a bit small), there is no support for any of the features that I described in the post (search, bookmarking, notes, etc...). I could possibly see the point in an Android Kindle application, but even so, all the restrictions above would probably make me use it less than a Kindle. Besides, how do you get newly released books? You can't. You have to pirate them. Sorry, but I buy my books. Posted by: Cedric at February 26, 2009 05:49 PMCedric... with a reader like mobipocket which I currently use, you get search, notes bookmarks, dictionaries. You can read a smartphone in daylight, just turn off the backlighting, try it (did this during a 4 hours train ride). And having only one battery to take care of is easier (you can recharge on USB or alkalines). I admit that Windows-based PDA/phones are horrible, but others have excellent battery life and ergonomics (again, you should try the analogic scroll wheel to scroll pages, it allows a non-disruptive reading flow and a one-hand operation). PS: Sorry, but I will never buy DRM-crippled material anyways. For ebooks I liked, I buy the paper version so that I can lend them to friends, just as I would have done before ebooks. And, anyways, most of the recent books I read were not available on the kindle, as they were from French authors. Also, you know, the kindle channel is not the only source of legit ebooks... Posted by: Colas Nahaboo at February 27, 2009 06:03 AMThe main disadvantage of this device is DRM - Digital Restrictions Management. You don't own the books you buy, you can't l_o_a_n a "book" to your friend when you're not using it, and when one day the provider decides to change the terms of (or discontinue) the service you may end up with nothing. Just like it happened several times before with DRM-restricted M_P_3s. It'd be be pretty dumb not to understand this. I understand the DRM restrictions perfectly, they just don't bother me that much. I don't l_oan books that often and if I want to share a book, I'll just buy it to that person and give it to them as a gift. Note that it's also possible to share Kindle accounts, so that's another way to do it. I have found that most people who pirate books/software/whatever in the name of freedom and claim that they would buy them if they were chea_per or DRM free are hypocrites. They just pirate because they can do it in all impunity but their shiny principles about fair pricing would go out of the window if the downloads could be traced to their home. DRM doesn't suck, it's just certain forms of it that do, but it's sad that you can't understand that something like DRM is necessary in order for the industry to exist at all. Another example of DRM that I find reasonable is Steam, but I'm pretty sure that it's unacceptable to you as well. Posted by: Cedric at February 27, 2009 09:56 AMI simply thought it was disingenuous, if not outright misleading, not to mention DRM as a disadvantage. Here's why: A regular book can last you a lifetime. How long will your DRM-restricted copy last? How will you read your "books" when your device breaks? What happens to your "books" when Amazon find the service unprofitable and discontinues it? What happens if you want to read your "books" on another (better and c_heaper) device that competes with Amazon's? This device is an attempt to kill the second-hand book market and, at the same time, to give the suckers an opportunity to buy DRM-restricted copies almost at the price of regular books. It's also great for implementing an Orwellian type propaganda machine: next time you read your "book" you may actually be reading a different version of it, with certain parts changed/censored out. As for your "I have found that most people... DRM is necessary in order for the industry to exist at all", you can pile up as many fallacies and anecdotal evidence as you want, it'll still make a poor argument. www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/index.cfm?newsid=24331 You may want to take a look at the Asus Eee T91 since you're such a gadget geek :) Posted by: Frank Bolander at March 3, 2009 11:00 AMPost a comment
|